Readercon: The Outcome

A little while ago, Readercon posted a public statement.

It follows closely the petition circulated by Veronica Schanoes, signed by 430+ people concerned that the con they’d attended or hoped to attend had demonstrated willful dismissal of published policy and, in doing so, implied that making the con a safe space was a secondary – or null – concern.

In the public statement, the concom bans Walling for life, apologizes to those they have wronged (a list that, quite rightly, includes far more people than Kate Kligman and myself), and outlines plans for improvement, with harassment training, a safety committee, and safeguards against conflicts of interest. The Board has resigned; a temporary Board will be put in place until elections can be held.

Notably, while this does not erase the initial, unacceptable decision, it doesn’t try. It presents straightforward apologies, reasonable goals, an emphasis on transparency, and overall, implies that qualified people will be guiding the con going forward. I look forward to further developments here.


I have experienced a lot of things these last couple of weeks. Some of them, I want to mention sooner rather than later.

The con community (wider than just SF, as the Defcon, gaming, and skeptic communities are aware) is getting pretty well sick of harassment, it seems, and is ready to speak out against it. The response here has been remarkably swift, supportive, and focused — even when people were justifiably angry and upset, their anger was accurately directed, the discourse was largely civil, and there was, throughout, a heartening expectation of real change. That reflects what I hope is both faith in a concom to make good on its Board’s mistakes, and a wider shift in the community that will hold harassers accountable and make it easier for future targets of harassment to come forward.

That said, those who speak out to excuse harassers should not be silenced by this; on the contrary, they do us all a great service by alerting us to their perspective, so we may pointedly avoid them.

Coming forward is not an easy decision; it turns you, for a while, into an object lesson. I’ve been told I was both too rude and not nearly rude enough; that I was too quick to decide I was being harassed and also that I waited too long to decide I was being harassed; that I overreacted to what was clearly a well-established Canadian mating ritual, and also underreacted and should have kicked him so hard a lung collapsed.

In some ways here, I was lucky. I had some objective privileges; I am American, cisgender, white, and relatively young, all of which are, unfortunately, still factors in reporting harassment. Much of the harassment happened publicly and allowed for eyewitnesses; said eyewitnesses were absolutely stand-up in contacting myself and the Board to offer statements; Kate, someone unknown to me before this, came forward to corroborate his behavior at other cons, which established him as a serial harasser.

Perhaps most importantly, I had friends and strangers who spoke up, which was a vast expenditure of time and energy on their part, and whether or not I have ever met them, I want to thank them. It is an unspeakable comfort to see allies challenging apologists. I hope that this, also, continues, as a part of strengthening the anti-harassment sentiment across the board in con culture.

With luck, we’ll get to a time in which it is not necessary to defend a target of harassment, because harassment doesn’t happen at cons, or because, when it does, that shit is shut down like it should be. Until that day, I can only hope that those who come forward find the same support that I have. Thank you.


Since Kate came forward, she and I have been in communication about developments in the discussion, both officially and in fandom. In some ways, I’ve felt more responsibility for Kate than for myself in the outcome of all this. Her official statement to Readercon noted she’d withdrawn from cons because of harassment, and this would determine whether or not she’d feel safe there in future — the presence of Walling, she said, prevented her attending. Harassment would have driven me away only from the con that had ignored it; harassment had driven her away from cons almost entirely. To her, they were demonstrably unsafe spaces, and the Board’s initial decision did nothing to change that.

During this week, Readercon announced via Twitter that a vote was being made to overturn the Board’s decision; that a formal statement was in progress; they mentioned their intentions to set things right; they announced the Board’s intention to resign.

Over the weekend, late at night, a message to me from Kate popped up.

“So if this works out, wanna go to Readercon?”


Yes, I do. See you next year.

  • http://None None

    I'll see you there, Genevieve. :) (And thank you for everything you've done. You've been a heroine, for all of us.)

  • Cecilia Tan

    I'll be there, too. Time to show support for a con that came around. And thank you for speaking up. It can't have been easy to subject yourself to the fickle court of public opinion that anyone who speaks publicly about this sort of thing cannot avoid.

  • Cecilia Tan

    I'll be there, too. Time to show support for a con that came around. And thank you for speaking up. It can't have been easy to subject yourself to the fickle court of public opinion that anyone who speaks publicly about this sort of thing cannot avoid.

  • K Tempest Bradford

    I always feel odd when people say things like this to me, but I did want to let you know that I consider what you did very brave and I'm glad you did it even knowing what the consequences might be. Thank you for helping to move the conversation around harassment forward a big, big step by not allowing it to happen without comment, explanation, or pushback.

    Also, fuck everyone who has some criticism for how you handled the situation; bith the actual harassment and the aftermath.


  • Jenn Brissett

    You handled all of this with remarkable grace. Big props to you, lady!

  • Craig_Ranapia

    Owning your bullshit and making a meaningful commitment to real change – it matters.

  • Benjamin Barber

    Do you have a link to Kate's accusations, I wonder what her observations were? Because in only understanding the facts you presented in your case, it does not fit the criteria of sexual harassment. It seems to be in the case of legal jurisprudence that the accused is given the benefit of the doubt, and instead of taking a comprimise of a 2 year ban, you decided to wage a PR campaign of vigil ante justice.

    If we defer to kantian ethics as a measurement of objectivity, he obeyed the social contract that you gave him and did not violate it, furthermore you failed to obey the social contract with readercon. Furthermore it is not the means do not justify the ends, so the fact that you not only violated the readercon social contract, but did so with the intention of malice to match the incising you felt you experienced, based upon morals and expectations you hold internally and not objectively. So even if this punished person was a harasser for whatever reason, either a psychological pathology or desperation driven by society, it does not change the your ethical conduct.

    lastly, I emplore you consider a buddhist dialectic, when dealing with difficult organizations or individuals, as it may benefit both you and the other party in a more beneficial manner.

  • Nivair Gabriel

    I second everything Tempest, Jenn, and Dora said! I can't tell you how much I appreciate what you and Kate did, and I really value your taking the time to give us this perspective from “the other side” as well. The more we support each other, the less we have to fear. I'm so hopeful that cons and all author events will soon be as safe as they should be; you and your supporters have accelerated much-needed change, and that's an incredible inspiration.

  • Gioia

    I am so, so sorry that you had to go to such lengths to get this addressed. I am sickened that it took this much drama, this much noise, this much fuss to accomplish what should have been a very simple, obvious response. As a woman and as a mom of both a son and daughter, I am also very, very thankful that you, Kate, and so many others had the courage to step forward and say, “Enough.” Which again takes me back to just feeling dreadful that it was necessary. The amount of abuse you’ve endured over this is nauseating. Thank you for leaving your posts open for responses. Thank you for simply leaving your posts up. My 18-year-old son and I have had some fantastic discussions about this issue which would not have occurred without your posts. I am deeply grateful for the opportunity you’ve created for me to help him become a better man, as well as the fact that you and and so many others are making it possible for these cons to be safer places for my daughter to express her geekish delight and writing ambitions. Grazie.

Recent Work

The Workings Of Nature: Naturalist Writing And Making Sense Of The World,

Review: The Ultimate Ambition in the Arts of Erudition,

TV: The Other Side: Barb and the Women of Stranger Things, Vox

TV Recaps: UnREAL recaps, NYT

Review: Playing Dead: A Journey Through the World of Death Fraud,

Genevieve on Tumblr

2016 Appearances

Often updated. Please check back!

Emerald City Comicon, April 7-10, 2016

Kent State Wonder Woman Symposium, September 23-24, 2016

NYCC, October 5-9, 2016